THE IMPACT OF INTEREST RATE ON OTHER SELECTED MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES IN NIGERIA (1970-2010)
ABSTRACT
This study was embarked upon with a view
to determining the impact of interest rate on other selected
macroeconomic variables in Nigeria. Data were sourced from CBN Abuja and
NBS. Data were analyzed using the ordinary least square regression
(OLS). Results indicate that: Interest rate is inversely related
investment and also negatively related with GDP. On the basis of the
above stated findings some policy recommendations were
made.(1)Government should establish policies that encourage increase in
savings deposit rate, reduction in lending rates and also, efficient and
reliable financial institutions encourage people to save. (2) The
require reserve ratio should be to strengthen the lending rate of
commercial banks. (3) We recommend that the government and financial
authorities should implement policies that favour income growth such as
job creation and increase in salaries and wage increase as these will
affect investment significantly.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
Interest rates play important role in
controlling major macroeconomic variables. The primary role of interest
rate is to help in the mobilization of financial resources and to ensure
efficient utilization of resources for the promotion of economic growth
and development (CBN 1970).
However, they are various states of
interest rates in the financial system. They are generally classified
into two categories: Deposit and lending rates. Deposits rate are paid
to savings and time deposits of different maturities, while lending
rates are interest rates charged on loans to customers and they vary
according to cost of loanable funds and lending margins.
A number of factors influence the
behaviour of interest rates in an economy. Prominent among these are the
volume of savings, inflation, investment, government spending, monetary
policy and taxation constitute the major source (supply) of credit
while investment represents the major demand for credit. Therefore, the
level of savings partly determines the level of interest rates. For
instance, a decrease in the accumulation of loanable funds (savings) is
bound to exert an upward pressure on interest rates, just as the reverse
situation would tend to have a moderating effect. Usually, when the
structures of interest rate are changed, the resulting relative rates of
return will induce shift in the assets portfolio of both banks and the
non-banks public institutions. Hence, the direction and magnitude of
changes in the market interest rates are of primary importance to
economic agents and the policy makers.
Consequently, the Nigerian Economy has
been highly prone to interest rate volatility and fragility (CBN, 2000).
Interest rates of all instruments have experienced very volatile
movements. Inconsistencies have been the order of the day (Adewunmi,
1997).
Prior to the structural adjustments
programme (SAP), the level and structure of the interest rates were
administratively determined by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). Both
deposits and lending rates were fixed by the bank, based on policy
decision (CBN, 1962). At that time, the major reasons for administering
interest rates were the desire to obtain social optimum resource
allocation, promote orderly growth of the financial market and combat
inflation in implementing the credit policy. During this time, the
minimum rediscount rate which was very low, averaging about 7.25 percent
between 1975 and 1985.
Also, preferred sectors could not access
funds because financial institutions were unable to raise sufficient
funds form the money market at the favoured concessionary rates (Staley
and Morse, 1966). Within the general framework of deregulating the
economy in 1986, in order to enhance competition and efficient
allocation of resources, the CBN introduced a market based interest rate
policy in August 1987 (CBN, 1987). The policy decision was not without
controversy, and later,it was generally agreed that low interest rates
did not encourage savings. It was feared that high interest rate which
was likely to accommodate the deregulation of interest rates allowed
banks to determine their lending and deposit rates according to market
conditions through negotiations with their customers (CBN, 1987).
However, the minimum rediscount rate
(MRR) which influenced interest rates continued to be determined by the
CBN in line with changes in overall economic conditions. The MRR which
was 15 percent in August 1987 was reduced to 12.5 percent in December
1987 with the objective of stimulating investment and growth in the
economy (CBN, august 9, 2006). During the same period, the prime lending
rates of commercial banks and merchant banks were on the average
18.0and 20.5 percents respectively. But following the need for moderate
monetary expansion in 1989, the MRR was raised to 13.5 percent. It was
also observed that there were wide disparities in the interest rates
structure of the various banks.
As it were, the ceiling on interest
rates were removed in January 1992 and retained in 1993. Interest rate
in 1993 was volatile and rose to unprecedented level. On the basis of
the foregoing developments, some measures of regulations were introduced
in 1994. The developments in interest rates within this period were
generally within the prescribed limits but the rates on the other hand
were negative in real terms since inflation was estimated to be over 50
percent.
All the same, the banks still maintained
the interest rate regime in 1995 with some modifications just to make
it flexible. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the change in
interest rates were significantly different from what prevailed during
the era of regulation. Over the past three decades, high macro-economic
instability has become a key determinant and the consequence of poor
economic management. Nigeria, a country blessed with abundant natural
resources is seen as one the countries that have the most volatile
macroeconomic aggregates. This is in order with National Economic
Empowerment and Development strategy (NEEDS, 2004) which says that
“between 1975 and 2000, Nigeria’s broad macroeconomic aggregates growth,
the terms of trade, the real exchange rate, government revenue and
spending were among the most unstable in the developing world”.
It is these developments which have
fuelled the need to embark upon this study. It could be possible that
the macroeconomic instability is deep rooted in erratic movements of
interest rates.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
It is a well known fact that the
Nigerian Economy is characterized by volatile interest rates, macro
economic instability. Several measures embarked upon by the CBN failed
to correct these defects in the economy. The most important of these
measures were contained in the amendment of the CBN monetary circular No
21 which diverted the control of rates from CBN on August1, 1987. The
bank had been in control of the cost of credit in the economy regulating
the interest rates charged by the commercial and merchant banks in
their lending activities.
As it is, banks determination and
control of interest rates on loans did not help for the stability of
major macroeconomic variables due to the volatile nature of rates during
the planning period. Currently, interest rates are market determined
and the study intend to investigate the impact of interest rate on some
selected macroeconomic variables. In view of this, the research
questions are stated as below;
1. What is the nature of the relationship between interest rates and the gross domestic product of Nigeria?
2. What is the nature of the relationship between the interest rates and the level of domestic investment in Nigeria?
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The broad objective of the study is to
determine the relationship between interest rate and other selected
macroeconomic variable such as Investments and Gross Domestic Product
(GDP) in Nigeria.
The specific objectives are;
1. To determine the impact of interest rate on GDP.
2. To determine the impact of interest rate on investment
1. To determine the impact of interest rate on GDP.
2. To determine the impact of interest rate on investment
1.3 STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESES
The research hypotheses will be formulated in the null and alternative hypothesis form.
1. Ho: Interest rate has no significant impact on GDP in Nigeria.
Hi: Interest rate has significant impact on GDP in Nigeria.
Hi: Interest rate has significant impact on GDP in Nigeria.
2. Ho: Interest rate has no significant impact on investment in Nigeria.
Hi: Interest rate has significant impact on investment in Nigeria.
Hi: Interest rate has significant impact on investment in Nigeria.
1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The findings of this study will be considered significant in the following ways;
1. The major findings would be very useful to the CBN when formulating monetary policy for the country.
2. The findings will be useful to the
policy makers for providing guidelines for controlling operations in
money and capital market.
3. Lastly, the findings will serve as guidelines to the investing public in their decision making.
1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
Interest rates include mainly the
lending rates. However, this study will be limited to lending rates
during the floating interest rates regime. The study will cover the
years from 1970 to 2010.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 THEORETICAL REVIEW
Interest rate has been a controversial
issue since the era of the classical, neo classical and Keynesians
(Gollarday 1978). In Gollarday’s explanation of the classical view, he
defined interest rate as a price Keynesians in their own view defined
interest rate as reward.
Presently, the controversy has not been
put to test as regard the general notion of interest rate. They are
affected by differences in the development of financial markets, the
degree of separation of savings and investments decisions and the
freedom of capital movement from county to country.
2.1.1 REAL AND NORMINAL INTEREST RATE
Someone who lends money wants to be
compensated for the time value of money i.e. not being able to use his
money for consumption. Furthermore, the lender wants to be compensated
for the risk that the purchasing power has decreased at the time of
payment of the loan.
SOLD BY:
No comments:
Post a Comment