THE IMPACT OF PETROLEUM SUBSIDY ON THE CONSUMPTION OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS IN NIGERIA
ABSTRACT
The petroleum sector is an indispensable
body in Nigeria economy. It has remained the Nigerian biggest revenue
earner. It still brings in more than 80% of the foreign exchange earned
by the country. However, this resulted in the shortage of the quantities
of petroleum products consumed locally in the country. Hence, the
problem of development is generally faced in Nigeria. This work will as
well go to show what actually constitute the petroleum subsidy in
Nigeria. It will analyze the cost to the government if not removed and
the welfare of the local consumers. It will also reveal to a greater
extent what effect it has on the GDP of the economy, at its full
sustenance, partly to be taken in the issue of petroleum subsidy in
Nigeria. The research work used a dummy variable to explain its finds(1
when there is subsidy and 0 when there is no subsidy).The research work
however, looks into the impact of petroleum subsidy on the consumption
of petroleum products in Nigeria and it was found that there are more
consumption of petroleum products with subsidy than without. Among other
recommendations the study opines that government should diversify the
economy as quickly as possible and direct its positives to other sector
of the economy that have been overlooked.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Petroleum subsidy is one of the most
passionate and controversial issue of the Nigeria‘s petroleum industry
irrespective of the technical, economic, political aspects and
implementation of politics adhering to one pricing system or another
would largely hygiene the ultimate pattern of cost and profit sharing of
the two major parties concern that is the producer (NNPC) and the
consumers.
The momentum generated by the
exploitation and exploration of oil has been regarded by many as a
“mixed blessing”. Nigeria started exploring its petroleum resources in
the mid 60’s, however, it was until the early 70’s that large scale
production was realized in Nigeria and by May 1970, had entered the
league of the largest ten oil producers and by1973, oil accounted for
over 80% of our foreign exchange earnings.
The presence of petroleum and the
greater spending power which followed has no doubt acted as a catalyst
in Nigeria‘s economic development constraints-finance. Consequently,
however, it has given rise to the planning executive and completion of
some worthwhile project and has given a stronger “twice” to Nigeria in
international politics.
The oil arrival created its own
problems, given Nigeria‘s absorptive capacity conceived in its widest
context. There have been adjustments. However, not only has the
petroleum power created illusion in the economy, it has given impetus to
false hope. Many policy decisions were not given through thought since
finances was not a constraint.
The consequences of FESTAC and UDORJI
award are still with us. The enormous financial power also led to the
federal government over extending its activities and responsibilities
resulting largely to waste and inefficiency.
Petroleum subsidy has been removed several times in the past years
beginning from 1980 to present, because of the drastic reduction in the
government revenue as a result of oil glut in 1981 and the attendant
austerity situation, also because of the loans collected from the
international monetary fund (IMF). This is to enable the country to meet
up with its foreign debts. In 1986 the federal government removed 80%
of the subsidy on the price of petroleum products. The second tier
foreign exchange marked (SFEM) and its successor foreign exchange market
(FEM) inflated the remaining 20% subsidy to nearly (100%) because of
the decline value of naira via-a-vis the us dollar.
The federal ministries of information
disclosed sometime in 1987 that government would save or gain more than
#6 billion per annum in revenues if petroleum products were correctly
priced. He analyzed that the cost of producing one barrel of petrol was
#110.79. It was sold locally for #35.48 and showed a loss of #75.79. It
was the intention of government to stop this loss, but the percentage of
subsidy removed will be such that people will suffer undue hardship. It
was contended that the removal would generate additional revenue to the
government. It would also conserve petroleum products for export and so
earn additional foreign exchange.
More so, the heavy subsidy of petroleum
products contributed to the lopsided development of the Nigeria energy
system. It was also inferred that the extra #6 billion could be used to
support the economy and provide social amenities.
Currently the objective of subsidizing,
that is to aid the poor- stabilize prices, promote economic growth which
have not been achieved rather NNPC resorted to massive importation of
products to stem the scarcity. The short fall between the landed cost of
imported products and their selling prices are also the subsidy claim
by NNPC. This so called subsidy can be justified for now and until such a
time that the power supply situation in the country improves to the
extent that it enables the ordinary Nigerian to work hard enough to
raise his income level to a level absorb future increase in petroleum
products, and until there is an acceptable level of infrastructural
development to cushion the impact of increased cost of petroleum
products.
It is self-evident that as at the year
2000 there is no subsidy removal or whatsoever on Petroleum products in
Nigeria. Indeed, from current cost of refining at $10 per barrel sold to
the NNPC refineries, the price of petrol (PMS) should be #15 per liter
as against the pump price of #22 per liter. Thus the current price of
PMS includes sufficient government task indicating that no subsidy
exists on the current product prices.
More so, when the naira hopefully
recovers its lost grounds, a new (reversed) twist may be given for the
problem of petroleum subsidizes. It goes to show that whatever the
action the government may take on petroleum between 2000 and the year
2003, it probably will not be the last word on the matter
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Nigeria is one of the major sources of
crude oil in the world. The importance of petroleum to Nigeria can only
be appreciated when one realizes the dominant role it plays in our
economy. Petroleum products and export is the main stay of the Nigerian
economy providing almost 90% of our export earning locally petroleum
products are used as major sources of energy for the industry.
Petroleum is an international commodity,
which is highly politicized since variation is supply of the commodity
has been known to cause ripples in the international commodity is
evident for the cartel cliché that exist to bring about a measure of
control in the supply price marketing of petroleum. Petroleum prices are
based on the dollar currency.
It has been believed in the past that
Nigeria stood ready and in fact subsidized petroleum products. This
accounted for low prices of petroleum products. this accounted for low
prices of petroleum products in Nigeria and comparative prices obtained
in other countries their oil glut which had affected the Nigerian
economy adversely has caused the country to reduce the subsidy on
petroleum products. Of later Nigeria has sought assistance from world
international financial institution.
The aid has required that the nation
reduce or reduce or remove entirely subsidy on petroleum products before
any assistance can materialized Thus, so that the country can earn more
income to solve its debt problems.
The dollar removal of subsidy and thus,
increase in local prices of petroleum products has generated a lot of
attention lately. All this reduced us to delve into the study of the
economies petroleum subsidies in Nigeria
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM
During the national debate on the
international monetary fund (IMF) loan, in 1985, most Nigerians oppose
to the withdrawal of the so-called government subsidy on petroleum
products in Nigeria, which was part of the (IMF) conditionality‘s. But
the military government rejected the loan; it went along in 1986 to
remove 80% of the subsidy. While the economy was still battling with the
inflationary consequences of this, the second-tier foreign exchange
market (SFEM) was introduced.
In addition to refueling inflation, SFEM
introduced other distortions in the economy. One of such distortion is
the pricing of petroleum products in Nigeria. Therefore, the need to
review the domestic price of petroleum products has become necessary for
the following problems.
1.2.1 The domestic
price of local products is well below what operates in other countries
including our neighboring countries. This low price level, for petroleum
products has tended to encourage the usage of products as amply
demonstrated in the growth pattern, which is not explainable on the rate
of industrial growth of the country. Furthermore, this price
differential has encouraged active trafficking in products across our
borders and shores. The result is that government is subsidizing a much
larger population in respect of petroleum products.
1.2.2. The creation of
distortions in the consumption of petroleum product. Subsidy discourages
consumers (especially the private sector of the economy) from being
cost conscious.
1.2.3. The current
level petroleum prices does not adequately account for the capital
outlay and overhead incurred in manufacturing and distribution of
petroleum product in Nigeria.
1.2.4. The early 80%
subsidy withdrawal and the impact it has on the economy, plus the effect
of oil glut on prices of petroleum product, coupled with inflation
which has eroded the expectation of the government in relation to the
generation of appropriate revenue.
1.3 THE OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The research would however intend to
investigate on the major effect of petroleum subsidy on consumption of
petroleum product in Nigeria. However, it will be able to determine how
“the reduction in the price of petroleum products via subsidy” can
consequently lead to distortion on the consumption of petroleum product
(wasteful consumption) in the economy, adulteration and smuggling of
petroleum products and however, does not account adequately for the
capital outlay and cost overhead incurred in the production and
distribution of petroleum in Nigeria could adversely harmfully affect
the revenue generation, economic development and human growth of the
economy.
Moreover, i will always attempt to make
some necessary policy recommendation which will enable the Nigerian
government to make necessary economic decision towards the impact of
subsidy on petroleum to remove or allow.
1.4 THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The following research questions would
serve as a guide to enable this project achieves its identical problems
solution and objectives. Which depends mostly on the impact of petroleum
subsidy on the petroleum production and consumption in Nigeria and what
government should do in order to boost stability in the economy via
petroleum consumption?
The questions are:
• Has Nigerian government given subsidy on petroleum before?
• What are the impacts of the subsidy on petroleum consumption?
• What are the necessary policy recommendations for economic stabilization via the effect of petroleum subsidy?
• Has Nigerian government given subsidy on petroleum before?
• What are the impacts of the subsidy on petroleum consumption?
• What are the necessary policy recommendations for economic stabilization via the effect of petroleum subsidy?
1.5 THE STATEMENT OF THE HYPOTHESIS
Based on the available information and
data, this researcher will be able to test the following hypothesis
whether to accept and or reject them. This gives the researcher the
insight to make the decisions and policy recommendations using a common
decisions rules and certain level of significance. It follows:-
1. Petroleum consumption on the average
does not have a linear relationship with the gross domestic products for
capital and petroleum subsidy. Mathematically:
Ho: b1=b2=0
Ho: b1=b2=0
2. Petroleum consumption has linear
relationship with the gross domestic product per capital and the
petroleum subsidy. Mathematically:
Ho: b1≠b2≠0
Ho: b1≠b2≠0
1.6 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
This work on petroleum subsidy in
Nigeria will go a long way to trying to exposed the problem associated
with the petroleum subsidy maintenance and its removal in the economy.
Meanwhile government, private and
individual household sectors are expected to benefit much from this
work. The firm and the household sectors that form the major consumers
of petroleum products will be able to either or not to appreciate
government intentions to remove the subsidy on petroleum products in
Nigeria.
This work will as well go to show what
actually constitute the petroleum subsidy in Nigeria. It will analyze
the cost to the government if not removed and the welfare of the local
consumers. It will also reveal to a greater extent what effect it has on
the GDP of the economy, at its full sustenance, partly to be taken in
the issue of petroleum subsidy in Nigeria.
1.7 THE SCOPE OF THE STUDY
Based on the work, references are to be
made on the production of petroleum in Nigeria, with special touch on
pricing policy and the marketing strategy of petroleum. There will be
general overview on the concept of subsidy and cost analysis in the
petroleum industry, major elements of and basic assumptions for, the
calculation of crude oil and consumption.
There will be a general overview of
cost-benefit analysis of petroleum subsidy in Nigeria, particularly, to
what effects its withdrawal and sustenance will have on the economy,
influence of structural adjustment programmed (SAP) on petroleum
subsidy, SFEM and subsidy will be reviewed, the nature of the country
without oil will be looked into.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
THE THEORETICAL REVIEW OF THE IMPACT OF PETROLEUM SUBSIDY ON THE CONSUMPTION OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS IN NIGERIA
Petroleum, a very versatile and flexible
non-reproductive depleting natural (hydrocarbon) resources is a
fundamental input into modern economic activity, providing about 50% of
the world total energy demand. It is an oily, bitummous liquid
consisting of a mixture of many substances namely the elements of carbon
and hydrogen. It‘s also contains vary small amount of non-hydrocarbons
at about 0.6% in weight namely, nitrogen and oxygen. It generally occurs
at depts. below 1,500 meters. It is the major source of energy and
today has become the bedrock of man progress and revenue generation for
government. The use of petroleum raw materials ranges widely from the
production of pharmaceuticals, fertilizers, fibers for the manufacture
of textiles and numerous other products essential for human consumption,
petroleum jelly for the body, and candle for lighting and bitumen for
tarring roads are some of the many by-products of petroleum.
Petroleum subsidy however, is one of the
most passionate and controversial issue of the Nigeria‘s petroleum
industry. Irrespective of the technical economic, political aspect and
implementation of policies, adhering to one pricing system or another
would largely influence the ultimate pattern of cost and profit sharing
of the two main parties concerned namely the producer and the consumers.
The concept of ―subsidy has been defined
by various authors and also from various perspectives via producers,
consumers and government angles. One of the such definitions is that
subsidy is a payment to individuals or business by a government for
which it receive no product or services in return (the McGraw-Hill
dictionary of modern economics, 1973, 496-497).
SOLD BY:
No comments:
Post a Comment