INVESTIGATING THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE USING POWDERED BURNT BRICK AS PARTIAL REPLACEMENT FOR CEMENT AT DIFFERENT WATER CEMENT RATIO
ABSTRACT
As a result of the high cost of
building materials and The continual increase in the cost of
conservative Building materials such as cement, substitute solutions are
brought through the use of low cost/waste materials such as
agricultural byproducts, industrial and recycled building materials
which have been proved to be suitable for a wide range of use in
concrete production. This brings the need for studies into the use of
powdered burnt brick (PBB) as partial replacement for cement being the
most important ingredient materials used in the production of concrete.
This study investigates the compressive strength of high strength
concrete produced with powdered burnt brick as partial replacement for
cement at different water cement ratio. it aimed to investigate the
feasibility of using waste bricks powder in high strength concrete. This
was achieved through some set of objectives which includes
determination of the physical properties of powdered burned brick,
chemical decomposition, and loss of ignition, to compare to that of
cement. and also to find out the optimum percentage to which cement can
be replace with powdered burned brick. Cement is replaced by waste
bricks powder for 10% PBB, 20% PBB and 30% PBB by it weight at 0.35 and
0.40 water cement ratio. Concrete cubes and cylinders were cast under
the two water cement ratio at different percentages, and cured for 3, 7,
14, 21, and 28days. The specimens were crushed at each of the curing
days to determine the compressive and flexural strengths. The results
validated that the bricks powder show pozzolanic properties. It also
show that concrete with partial cement replacement by waste bricks
powder has minor strength loss as tested after 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
curing days . The study also ascertained the use of lower water cement
ratio as the best to produce desire high strength concrete but super
plasticizer is added to increase the strength and workability of the
concrete. The results of the investigation confirmed the potential use
of this bricks powder material to produce high strength concrete. It is
therefore recommended that bricks waste should be utilize by grinding it
in to powder to replace cement at allowable percentages so as to reduce
the cost of cement and also save the environment.
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY
Most of the developed countries, such as
South Africa, Canada and Nigeria are stumble upon with the problem of
construction materials shortages because of the continues increased in
population and demand for new construction works. Concrete is the
world’s most consumed man made material used in construction works
(Naik, 2008). Concrete Production relies to a large extent on the
availability of cement, and other constituents. the costs of which have
risen astronomically over the past few years. Despite the increasing
cost of the cement, the demand for concrete is increasing. In concrete,
the economy, technical aspect, environmental and energy consumption is
important. Reduction of Portland cement without reducing performance of
concrete is very essential for massive projects that need a lot of
cement. Today, pozzolan and cementations materials play an important
role in concrete. Wastes of industries and constructions which have
pozzolanic or cementitious property, not only can reduce environmental
pollution and energy consumption of construction industry, but also
reduces the cost.
Countless number of waste such as
agricultural byproducts, industrial and recycled building materials
exist which have been proved to be suitable for a wide range of use in
concrete production and also has a great potential for increased use in
the future time. Concrete is probably the most commonly used
construction material in the world. For desire characteristics of
concrete, many research and adjustment have been made in concrete. There
is always a requirement for concrete with high strength and durability.
For this, blended cement concrete has been introduced. Environmental
concerns regarding rapid consumption of natural resources and CO2
emission during cement manufacturing process have brought pressure to
reduce cement consumption by the use of cement replacement materials
(CRMs). Pozzolans are also known as cementitious materials, are used in
concrete ingredient with normal cement as replacement materials.
Originally the term pozzolan was associated with calcined earth and
volcanic ashes which normally react with lime in the presence of water
at ambient temperature (Pak, 2013).
Nowadays, this term covers all siliceous
or aluminous materials which are in fine powder form and react with
calcium hydroxide Emissions.
With the development, experimentation
and research in concrete technology, cement has been replaced by using
alternative material or changing cement composition such as pozzolanic
materials. There are different types of cement replacement materials
which are commonly used. Commonly used pozzolans are volcanic ash, brick
powder, pumicite, fly ash, metakaolin, ashes of rice husk, bagasse ash,
and silica-fume etc. Some of them are naturally occurring while others
are by-product from industrial processes and demolition waste.
Also in cement industries continues
effort are being made to reduce the consumption of raw materials, cost
of Portland cement, to shield the environment, and to enhance the
quality of cement. One way is to use certain low cost materials for
partial replacement of cement clinker. Low cost materials used are
industrial and agricultural by products (wastes). Mixture of Portland
cement and the above by products are known as blended cement or
composite cement. By definition, blended cement is hydraulic binders in
which some percentage of Portland cement is replaced by other hydraulic
or non-hydraulic materials. pozzolanic are The most common ingredient
blending with Portland cement. such as fly ash, rice husk ash, condensed
silica fume, burnt clay or filler components such as lime, stone and
other wastes materials (Dwivedi et al, 2006).
1.2 Aim and Objectives.
The aim of this study is to investigate
the feasibility of high strength concrete using powdered burnt brick as
partial replacement for cement.
And the objectives of the study are:
- To investigate some physical and chemical properties of the powdered burnt brick (PBB).
- To determine the compressive strength of concrete produced with powdered burnt brick at different percentages and at different water cement ratio.
- To ascertain the suitability of replacing cement partially with powdered burn brick in strength properties of concrete.
- To understand and appreciate the phenomenon of pozzolanic reaction as evidenced if cement is replaced with this powdered burnt brick at different percentage for high strength concrete.
1.3 Scope and Limitation of the study
The finest of Brick dust has a great
potential use when is partially replaced with cement in production of
concrete at a certain percentage due to it pozzolanic properties. Even
though there are different types of pozzolanic material, but the scope
of this research is only focusing on the production of high strength
concrete using the powdered burnt brick as partial replacement for
cement at 10%, 20%, and 30% with different water cement ratio? The study
is limited to determine the strength characteristic of the concrete.
There are obstacles to the successful implementation of this research.
While it is firmly established that brick dust has the ability to have a
pozzolanic reaction with lime and increased the strength of the
concrete. Brick dust also has
the capability to react with cement depend on a number of variables
which will be discuss at length in this study. The Specimen used for
compressive strength were standard cubes of 100mm by 100mm by 100mm and
cylinder of 150mm by 150mm (diameter and height) as prescribed by BS 12
1991. Time limitation is also another constraint in this study.
1.4 Statement of Problem
As a result of the high cost of
building materials and The continual increase in the cost of
conservative Building materials such as cement, substitute solutions are
brought through the use of low cost/waste materials such as brick dust,
fly ash, and guinea corn husk ash etc . This brings the need for
studies into the use of powdered burnt brick (PBB) as a replacement for
cement being the most important ingredient materials used in the
production of concrete.
There is need for a simple methods of
determining a given brick suitability that can be performed in the field
with relative ease, while yielding sensibly accurate and consistent
results. Criteria for the ideal field test would include the ability to
be performed with limited equipment, limited technical proficiency
requirement, and would yield result a relative short amount of time.
This is particularly important for project or locales that may not
possess the resources or technology that is required to make a thorough
study to inform the use of the material.
1.5 Justification of the Study
This work will serve as reference
material for researchers or students knowledge by exposing them to the
practical aspect matter and addition to the theoretical aspect. This
research work will be of immense important to those that are considering
a substitute low cost material to replace cement in concrete
production.
1.6 Methodology
This research work was carried out
through the review of relevant literatures in, book, journals,
monographs and other related data. Base on this the experimental
programs were drawn. Casting of 36 cube of 100mm by 100mm
by 100mm and 6 cylinder of 150mm by 150mm (diameter x height) with 0 %
, 10% , 20 % and 30%. Of powdered burnt brick replacement for cement
(by weight of cement) at 0.35 and 0.40 water cement ratio. The concrete
will be cured and tested at end of 3days; 7days; 14 days; 21days and
28days of curing in ordinary water. 5 cubes 3 cylinders samples of each
percentage will be crushed at end of each curing day. The specimens
where crushed, tested and their compressive strength was determined.
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter is presenting a literature
review that has been done on this subject so as not to have a duplicated
work. Here as the topic is, we will be reviewing literatures on the
topic “investigating the strength of high strength concrete using
powdered burnt brick as a partial replacement for cement at different
water cement ratio”.
2.2 Concrete
Concrete is a construction material
composed of cement (commonly Portland cement) as well as other
cementitious such as fly ash and slag cement, aggregate (generally a
coarse aggregate such as gravel, limestone or granite, plus a fine
aggregate such as sand), water, and chemical admixtures. The word
concrete comes from the Latin word “concretus” (meaning compact or
condensed), the past participle of “concresco”, from “com-” (together),
and “cresco” (to grow), Topku (2007), defined concrete as a three phased
anisotropic brittle material that behaves differently under different
variety of loads.
No comments:
Post a Comment