AN
ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MASS HOUSING PROGRAMME IN NIGERIA
(A CASE STUDY OF FEDERAL CAPITAL
TERRITORY, ABUJA)
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
As the scale of the housing
challenge in the developing world is increasing at an alarming pace, the need for
real action to address affordable housing supply is becoming increasingly
critical. To deal with this challenge governments and local authorities are
updating their knowledge on global housing policy approaches in order to
formulate effective policy instruments. Over the years Nigeria has developed
and implemented a number of housing policies and strategies, in an attempt to
address the
housing of its citizens and
particularly the low-income group (Abdullahi 2010).
Abuja has been experiencing very
rapid urbanization. This is largely due to urban growth associated with natural
population growth and rural-urban migration driven by rapid socio-economic
changes and development, tied to the movement of the seat of Federal Government
of Nigeria from Lagos to Abuja in 1991. However, this growth has not been
matched with simultaneous provision of adequate housing infrastructure.
The demand for basic infrastructure
services has also grown over the years, quickly outstripping the supply
capacity of existing assets which manifested in the acute shortage of dwelling
units and resulted in overcrowding, high rents, poor urban living conditions.
Many years of underinvestment and poor maintenance have left Abuja with a
significant infrastructure deficit which is holding back the city development
and economic growth. Abuja needs to make massive investments beyond the means
available to government in order to close its yawning infrastructure gap. The
Federal Government believes that the private sector can play an important role
in providing some of this new investment through Public Private Partnerships
(PPPs). Therefore, the need to provide adequate, suitable and equitable housing
has remained a major priority of the government, since that piecemeal housing
can never solve the housing
requirement of the country estimated
at about 16 million units (Gemade, 2010).
With the declining financial
resources of government on housing delivery and other infrastructural services,
Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) has been widely advocated for housing and
infrastructure development in Nigeria as part of recent housing reforms. The
National Housing Policy (NHP, 2006) marked a significant transition of the
government to position itself as enabler and facilitator in housing delivery.
It advocated increased participation by the private sector and emphasized
government’s role in creating conditions to boost housing supply by eliminating
legal and regulatory constraints and supporting appropriate infrastructure
investments.
This entailed a notable shift in the
public sector role from direct housing provision to engaging the private sector
in constructing, financing, operating and maintaining housing units. Deriving
from international documents such as the Global Strategy for Shelter to the
year 2000 (UNCHS, 1992), and later Enabling Markets to work (World Bank, 1993),
subsequent policy documents like Nigeria National Housing Policy (NHP, 2006)
emphasized the policy thrust of simultaneously enhancing and changing the roles
of the public and private sectors. This new role requires that real estate
developers learn how to build houses to particular price targets, so that
members of different income groups can aspire to the status of homeownership.
The purpose of all these policies is
to ensure that all Nigerians especially the low income groups own or have
access to decent, safe and healthy housing accommodation that would be achieved
through a private sector led housing delivery system anchored on mass
construction of houses and strong mortgage finance (NHP, 2006).
All these areas have their
accompanied housing environment to accommodate the bulk of its residence. Phase
Three has six residential districts and four sector centers.
However, the detailed land use plan
for phases III and IV are still begin processed, and the planned and unplanned
population for these areas are causing overcrowding of the built up areas.
1.2 STATEMENT OF RESEARCH PROBLEM
Mass Housing programme involving the
public-private partnership was launched in the year 2000, towards providing
adequate housing stock for the growing population of the federal capital
territory. Under this arrangement, the Federal Capital Territory Administration
(FCTA) is expected to provide land and required primary infrastructure to the
housing development sites while the developers provide the houses and tertiary
infrastructure according to the approved specifications of the FCT authority.
However, the implementation of mass housing programme has been ongoing for a
long time now but there does not seem to be much progress with respect to
adequate provision of infrastructure and home ownership by the programme,
indicating that critical gap exists between programme’s target and reality.
The study therefore sets to answer
the following questions.
1. What is the level of implementation
of the mass housing delivery programme under the public private partnership in
the FCT?
2. What are the factors affecting PPP
mass housing delivery programme in the FCT?
1.3 AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF THE
STUDY
1.3.1 AIM
To appraise the implementation mass
housing delivery programme in the FCT and provide necessary suggestion for
improved mass housing in the study area.
1.3.2 OBJECTIVES
The Specific objectives of this
study include the following
1. To examine the concept and
strategies of Housing Delivery in urban centers.
2. To examine the Mass Housing Policy
and its requirement in the FCT.
3. To assess the implementation of the
mass housing programme under the public private partnership in the FCT to
determine level of success achieved so far.
4. To highlight the factors for the
implementation of mass housing programme in the FCT.
5. To offer suggestions towards
improvement in the implementation of the mass housing programme.
1.4 SCOPE AND LIMITATION
OF STUDY
The study will focus on public
private partnership mass housing programme in phase III and IV of Federal
Capital City (FCC) Abuja, which commenced in the year 2000.
It will also evaluate the
implementation of the programme in housing delivery in the FCT between years
2000 to 2010. The study is limited by unavailability or unwilling attitude of
most stakeholders to give necessary data for the research.
1.5 DEFINITION OF TERMS
HOUSING: Housing is defined as the process of
providing functional shelter in a proper setting within a neighborhood
supported by sustainable maintenance of the built environment for the day-
to-day living and activities of individuals and families within the community
(FRN,2006).
MASS HOUSING
This refers to a form of housing
provision in which houses are built in large number or quantity in a particular
area. According to the report of the presidential committee on urban
development and housing (2000), mass housing is defined as the process of providing
a large number of residential buildings on a permanent basis with adequate
physical infrastructure and social services in a planned, decent, safe and
sanitary neighbourhood to meet the basic and special needs of the population.
HOUSING DELIVERY PROGRAMME: Housing programmes, are specific
strategies usually initiated to increase the housing stock in a country. They
are instruments for implementing housing policies.
HOUSING DELIVERY SYSTEM: The housing delivery system involves
a complex process which flows in stages and in a sequential series to produce a
housing unit or units (Agbola, 1998). This process essentially involves the
bringing together of housing resources such as labor, land,
finance and building materials to
produce new housing. Housing delivery system also includes the policy, process
and methods of making the current stock available to the household. Thus, the
housing system encompasses the whole gamut of activities or processes involved
in the production and allocation of housing units to the households.
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: Wallace, (1998) defined
public-private partnerships as arrangements where development is undertaken
with a combination of not-for-profit, private and public participations of
programs. However, PPPs are not undertaken within the context of a single
mainstream program. They represent a more dynamic involvement of public sector,
and not-for-profit and private interests in which each contributes something
and shares some level of risk. It has also been defined as collaborative effort
among public, private and third sector organizations based on mutual trust,
division of labour and comparative advantage in the sharing of
responsibilities, risk and benefits (UN
HABITAT, 2006).
1.6 THE STUDY AREA
It was in 1976 that Federal Military
Government led by Late General Murtala Mohammed enacted Federal Capital
Territory Act (FCT) established Abuja after it has been chosen to be the
administrative capital of Nigeria and with solely administrative functions.
This was after the failure of Lagos due to the problems of inadequate land
space for future expansion, terrible traffic congestion, poor drainage, acute
housing shortage and associated costs, unbearable ethnic influence etc. The
planned period for the transfer was to be completed in 1986. However, it was on
12th December, 1991, that the final movement of Federal capital to
Abuja became a reality. Abuja is located in the geographical centre of Nigeria
(Figure 1.1) and lying
between latitudes 6o 45’ and
longitudes 7o 39’ north of the equator. The land of approximately 8,000 square
kilometres was carved out from the then neighbouring states of Kwara, Niger and
Plateau to serve as the FCT and the Federal Capital City (FCC) to constitutes
about 250 square metres. From its designed capacity the FCC will contain 3.2
million people when the development of the city is completed, however, the
Abuja population has exploded to 6 million with less than 50% of development
attained. The government vested all the land in FCT in the Federal Government
of Nigeria. The government also created Federal Capital Development Authority
(FCDA), as its agency responsible for the spatial planning and development of
the FCT.
1.6.1 POPULATION
Abuja is a fast growing city and its
growth is largely attributed to the role the city plays as the Federal Capital
Territory. According to the 2006 National Population Census, the population of
FCT is 1,406,239 which consist of ……
No comments:
Post a Comment