SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL FACTORS MILITATING AGAINST COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT IN IDEATO LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF IMO STATE
ABSTRACT
Over the years, Ideato North
Local Government Area of Imo state has been experiencing a slow rate of
development in the area. Based on this therefore, this work was designed
toinvestigate the socio-economic and cultural factors militating against rural
development in Ideato North Local Government Area. Two hundred respondents were
randomly selected and used. Questionnaire was the instrument used for data
collection. The data collected were analysed using SPSS and chi-square, tables,
charts and percentages were used to present the results. Several findings were
made as regards socio-economic and cultural factors militating against rural
development in Ideato North LGA. One major factor is that Ideato people are
facing total neglect from the government which goes a long way in affecting
their development negatively. Secondly, cultural belief system of the people
also affects their development. Thirdly, inadequate planning of developmental
projects caused by lack of collaborative efforts of the government and the
youths also hinder development in Ideato North LGA. Finally it was recommended
that government should focus more attention in the development of rural areas
in order not to allow them fell neglected and rejected. Rural people should
learn to welcome and harness development despite their cultural belief system
and there should be a collaborative effort of the government and the people,
more especially the youths in planning and implementation of rural development
projects.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background to the Study
In Nigeria, the rural areas are not
progressing in line with urban areas or metropolitan states in term having
sustainable development like good road, electricity, good telecommunication,
transportation, good water supply, standard market and health centres, improved
housing as well as improved agricultural and storage facilities that would help
in sustaining the rural masses. McKnight (1995) defined the term rural
development as the overall development of rural areas to improve the quality of
life of the rural people. According to Ihumodu (2003), rural development is the
process of economic and social progress aimed at eradicating poverty among
rural populace through provision of life and satisfying the basic needs of the
people. Eradicating poverty among rural people demands appropriate skill. Rural
people are endowed with quantum of knowledge and traditional skills, but at
their primitive levels, that needs development to fit in properly with the
modern trends of thing (Stall & Stoecker, 1998). This can be achieved
through capacity building programmes. Capacity building is the process of
developing skill, ability and faculties individually and collectively, that is
vital in comprehending rural development and its roles in ameliorating rural
poverty, ignorance, low human skill and literacy (Castelloe, 2002). All these
are done to sustain the development of rural setting. Sustainable development
vector (i.e. elements of desirable social objectives or attributes which
societies seek to achieve through conserving natural resources (Pearce &
Barbier, 1999).
Most rural societies are not able to
achieve development because they lack the basic resources that would bring
development or they are not able to harness and utilize the existing resources
that would enable them develop their society (Robinovitch, 1994). In Nigeria,
this has been serious social issue in recent time.
Socioeconomically, infrastructure and
basic amenities like good road, portable water supply, electricity, health
centres, markets, transportation, telecommunication, sports centers etc. affect
development. This is true because, when all these essential things are lacking,
development can hardly come or occur. Other important factors are illiteracy,
ignorance and poverty. On the other hand, government neglect can also affect
developmental process that will take place in the rural areas.
Culturally, belief system of the rural
people bridge development, for example, they find it difficult to release a
particularland for development due to the belief that it is on that land
sacrifices are being made for the gods of their land, secondly they find it
difficult to release a particular land for development to avoid the destruction
of their aesthetic values like trees and other things that bring about the
beauty of their area. Another cultural factor is on land tenure system
(ownership of land). This implies that some land owners in the rural areas do
not like releasing or letting go of their land for building of factories,
schools, market, churches, health centres etc. by the government or even
private individuals who are capable of doing so. By so doing, development is
swept under the carpet. Fear of terror and labelling are another vital cultural
factor which affect development, for example, an individual who is financially
capable can withdraw his intention to develop a particular rural area due to
the fear of getting him killed by armed robber and evil men or being labelled a
fraudster and also a ritualist.
Rural development is a multidimensional
and comprehensive concept; it encompasses the development of agriculture and
allied activities, village and cottage industries and crafts, socio-economic
infrastructure, community services and facilities and above all, human resources
in rural areas. As a phenomenon, rural development is the end result of
interactions between various physical, technological, economic, socio-cultural
and institutional factors (Isife, 1998). According to Igbokwe (2000), rural
development is a strategy designed to improve the economic and social wellbeing
of a specific group of people, i.e., the rural poor. As a discipline, it is
multi- disciplinary in nature, representing an intersection of agriculture,
social, behavioural, engineering and management sciences (Kata Singh, 1999).
Problems of rural areas could come as a result of the already stated factors,
most importantly, on the area of deliberate neglect of the rural areas by the
government. According to Prelleltensky (2004), rural development problems come
as a result of governmental deliberate neglect or inability of the rural
community to welcome development due to their cultural belief system etc.
According to rural development strategies 2002, through rural development
strategies, efforts of the people and that of the government are brought
together to improve the economic social and cultural conditions of the rural
areas, so as to integrate them into the life of the nation and allow them to
enable their people contribute more to national growth. Falcoya, (1984) on the other
hand stated that rural development strategies created an avenue for rural
people to organize themselves for aplanning actions, define their common
individual plans to meet the needs of the community and solve their problems,
execute these plans with maximum reliance upon community resources and
supplement these resources when necessary with services and materials from
government and non-governmental agencies outside their communities.
In addition, the issues concerning rural
development should be government involved as well as rural dwellers involved so
as to achieve a better solution to rural problems. That is to say that in order
to achieve a better rural development in Ideato LGA, government and the rural
people should integrate their efforts together. The study therefore tries
looking into the socio-economic and cultural factors militating against
development in Ideato Local Government Area of Imo State.
1.2
Statement of the Problem
The issue of rural development is very
challenging, considering that more than 70 percent of the population live in
the rural areas, where they cultivate the soil to make a living. Looking at
this poverty level it thereforebecomes a social problem thatdemands urgent
solution. One major factoraffecting rural development is government neglect or
government not showing concern towards rural development. According to Nwankpa
(2001), government should play pivotal role to making sure that development
occur in the rural setting. Another important factor is on lack of basic
infrastructure and basic amenities needed for development such as
transportation, good roads, electricity, good school, portable water, health
centres, markets, telecommunication, churches, recreational centres etc. When
all these infrastructures and basic amenities are not available in a particular
rural area, development finds it difficult to occur. Illiteracy, ignorance, and
poverty serve as another important factor militating against rural development
in Ideato rural community, Illiteracy, poverty and ignorance make or flop the
developmental process in the rural areas, so making them to move backward
(Edeh, 2003). Rural dispute is another factor militating against rural
development. This implies that when dispute comes between two communities due
to land, government who has planned bringing development can decide to withdraw
it till the dispute or conflict is settled. Land tenure system as well as
inability of the rural people to harnessing the available resources contributes
to the backwardness of the rural areas, especially rural, Ideato.
Furthermore, cultural beliefs of the
people in the rural areas affect the development that will come therein, for
example some rural areas always find it difficult to give government land for
development due to the fact that the land is where sacrifices are mad for the
gods of their land. Another fear they have is the destruction of theiraesthetic
values by the government while the development projects are going on. Some
individuals due to their selfish interest, find it difficult to dispose their
land to the government for them to build structures like hospitals, schools,
churches, recreational centres etc. According to Iyiogwe (2005), in his work on
economic theory says land is free gift of nature, such as land surface, soil,
rivers, mountains, forest, mineral deposits etc. Okorji (2005) restated that
land is therefore nature's aid to production. Another cultural factor is the
fear of terror and labelling. some private individuals avoid helping people in
some developmental structures in the rural area in order not to get them killed
or labelled as criminals, fraudsters or as ritualists by the rural people.
More so, the problem of gender
segregation is another crucial factor to be considered while discussing on the
cultural factor militating against rural development. The reason is that
sometimes women in the rural areas are not allowed to contribute in the issues
concerning rural or community development. By so doing, the ideas of
development becomes one sided which in turn affects the developmental
processes. Women should be allowed to contribute in the developmental issues,
whether political, economic, social and cultural. (Egbule, 2006)
Based on statistics, 65 per cent of the
lands in the rural areas are undeveloped due to total dominance by the owners.
According to Ikpeama (2004), land is a free gift of nature, and development of
any kind should be done on it, in as much as it will change the living standard
of the people. 85 per cent of our rural dwellers are not living in comfortable
homes, while 95 per cent of them are poor (Hossian, 2005). According to
agricultural organization of the United Nations (2005), 95 per cent of the
rural farmers cannot boast of using modern farming implements in
theiragriculture. All these hindrances have continued to put the rural
communities under a shackle of underdevelopment, in spite of the abundant human
talents there in. this unavailability of basic economic infrastructure in the
rural communities, hinders their potentials, especially being unable to
generate enough for themselves and contribute to the nation's economic growth.
Rural dwellers should be encouraged in their agricultural endeavours, which
will in turn help in the nation's economic building (Preben Kaarshelin, 1991).
When all these socio-economic and cultural factors that affect rural
development are put in place, there will be a rapid rural development,
especially in Ideato Local Government Area of Imo State.
1.3
Research Questions
The following research questions will
guide the study
1.
What are the socio-economic factors that
hinder rural development in Ideato Local Government Area?
2.
What are the cultural factors that
hinder rural development in Ideato LGA?
3.
What are the reactions of people to
development in Ideato LGA?
4.
To what extent have rural dwellers
helped in facilitating rural development in Ideato LGA?
5.
What are the consequences of improper
rural development in Ideato LGA?
1.4
Objectives of the Study
The main objective of this study is to
investigate on the socio-economic and cultural factors militating against rural
development in Ideato Local Government Area of Imo State. Its specific
objectives are therefore as follows:
1.
To evaluate the socio-economic factors
that hinder rural development in Ideato LGA.
2.
To investigates the cultural factors
that hinder rural development in Ideato LGA.
3.
To ascertain the reactions of people to
rural development in Ideato LGA.
4.
To examine the extent rural dwellers
have helped in facilitating rural development in Ideato LGA.
5.
To ascertain the consequences of
improper rural development in Ideato LGA.
1.5
Significance of the Study
The significance of this study tends to
treat both the theoretical and practical importance. Theoretically, this study
will add to the already existing knowledge of the socio-economic and cultural
factors militating against rural development in Ideato LGA. The study was
written in order to know the problems of the rural people and at the same time
proffer solutions to them. More so, the study will be a guide to future
researchers in their research in knowing the socio-economic factors militating
against rural development, and look for means of tackling those problems.
Practically, this research work will
enable the rural dwellers to know the importance of harnessing the available
rich natural resources in their localities in order to bring about development
in their areas. This can be done by making sure that the various natural
resources in the rural areas are well managed, through their efforts and
efforts of the government. This study will also make them to put in agenda the
issues concerning rural development, more especially on the areas of
infrastructures, such as good roads, electricity, portable water, health
centres, and transportation.
1.6
Definition of Terms
For more understanding of this research
work, the researcher has decided to define some of the terms which would be
frequently used for easy understanding.
Community :
Okoh (1989), defined community in line with this study as group of people
living in one geographical area and sharing the basic condition of common life.
Example, family, a village, town or city, a tribe, among others.
Community development:
Thus simply means all the strategies aimed at promoting the socio-economic
status of the rural communities. It aimed at motivating the rural dwellers to
utilize their full potentials in attempt to embark on the project that will
help better their lots. United Nations in line with this study defined
community development as including the effort of the government united with
that of the people themselves. Thus, the efforts of the people themselves are
united with that of the governmental authorities to improve the economic and
social well being of people to enable them to contribute fully in national
progress.
Development:
The definition of development by Walter Rodney (1972) was used in order to
explain this term. Development according to him implies increased skill and
capacity, greater freedom, creativity, self-discipline, responsibility and
increase in material wellbeing.
Rural: Rural areas
are characterized by their depleted workforce, their rudimentary and
inefficient mode of production, their general lack of basic infrastructure and
social amenities, such as portable water, all season access road, electricity,
schools, medical facilities, market, low level of health care delivery,
nutrition, hygiene, education and social awareness.
Rural development:
According to Ihumodu (2003), rural development is the process of economic and
social progress aimed at eradicating poverty through the provision of
employment, improvement in the quality of life and satisfying the basic needs
of the people.
Rural dwellers:
These are group of individual or persons living in the rural communities. These
group of persons are not urbanized and typically, much of their land is devoted
to agriculture.
Rural
Geographical Area: This is a mapped out area of the
earth's physical surface, in which rural people live.
No comments:
Post a Comment